What the scanner looked at
The homepage shows what made it into the corpus. This page shows the funnel that produced it — which feeds were checked, how many candidates were examined, and what happened to each one. If a feed quietly broke, you would see it here first.
Funnel · last 30 runs
Most recent Jun 2, 7:32 PMOff-topic and already-seen are healthy — the scanner is supposed to find lots of those, because most articles in any feed are not about Mythos and many feeds republish the same canonical link. Fetch- and classifier-failures should trend toward zero. If they don't, a source is probably broken.
Feed health
| Feed | OK / Total | Reliability |
|---|---|---|
| Anthropic News | 30 / 30 | 100% |
| arXiv cs.CR | 30 / 30 | 100% |
| CISA | 29 / 30 | 97% |
| Cloudflare AI | 17 / 17 | 100% |
| Cloudflare Security | 17 / 17 | 100% |
| Google DeepMind | 30 / 30 | 100% |
| Hacker News | 30 / 30 | 100% |
| Krebs on Security | 30 / 30 | 100% |
| Mandiant | 30 / 30 | 100% |
| NCSC UK | 30 / 30 | 100% |
| NIST Cyber | 30 / 30 | 100% |
| OpenAI | 30 / 30 | 100% |
| r/LocalLLaMA | 30 / 30 | 100% |
| r/MachineLearning | 30 / 30 | 100% |
| Schneier | 30 / 30 | 100% |
| The Register Security | 30 / 30 | 100% |
| The Verge AI | 30 / 30 | 100% |
| UK AISI | 0 / 30 | 0% |
| Wired Security | 30 / 30 | 100% |
Reliability is the percentage of recent runs in which a feed responded with HTTP 200 and parsed successfully. A feed below 70% is probably broken at the source — wrong URL, dropped service, or a Cloudflare challenge wall the scanner can't pass.